top of page

Collateral damage: How democracies wage war

By:

Dr. Martin Sherman

14 Sept 2025

Commentary
About The Authors

Dr. Martin Sherman

Senior Researcher

The incessant censure of Israel’s actions in Gaza reveals not only a disgraceful discriminatory double standard, but worse—the use of a singular standard applied to no one but the Jewish state, which, in and of itself, is the epitome of antisemitism. 

"There is always a cost to defeat an evil. It never comes free, unfortunately. But the cost of failure to defeat a great evil is far higher." - Jamie Shea, NATO spokesman, BBC News, May 31, 1999


"There are no sidelines or spectator seats, The people on the ground are considered combatants."  - Maj. David Stockwell, spokesperson for the UN forces in Somalia. Washington Post, Sept. 10, 1993  


Israel has been widely castigated for its response to the Hamas onslaught on Oct 7, 2023.


But to put Israel’s response in perspective, at least two factors need to be considered.  The first is the magnitude of the calamity that befell Israel in relation to its size. The other is how other democracies responded to unprovoked attacks – even those far smaller in relative terms.


Calculating comparisons 

In conducting this comparison, I will exclude from the discussion military campaigns carried out by the world’s major democracies over half a century ago—such as…

Recommended

Or Yissachar, Ms. Jennifer Teale

Europe’s Reckless Push to Recognize Palestine: A Threat to Israel and Jewish
Communities Worldwide
Transparant box.png

Ms. Jennifer Teale

Israel and Iran’s 12-Day War — A New Era of Deterrence in the Middle East
Transparant box.png

Ms. Jennifer Teale

How War Turned Israel’s High-Tech Sector Into a National Lifeline
Transparant box.png
Department
Type
bottom of page